Summary of the Opinion issued by Lord Hodge

In an urgent application to the court by the joint administrators of Rangers Football Club plc for directions under the Insolvency Act 1986, Lord Hodge issued an opinion today.

The administrators asked to be given directions on whether they could be prevented from terminating the contracts which Rangers entered into in May 2011 with two limited liability partnerships (“Ticketus”) by which Rangers sold large numbers of season tickets for matches at its Ibrox stadium in each of the seasons from 2011-2012 until 2014-2015.

The directions which the administrators sought were first:

“as to whether the administrators can be prevented from causing [Rangers] to terminate, albeit in breach of their terms, the [Ticketus agreements].”

After discussion in court they asked the court, in the alternative, to give:

“a direction as to the legal nature of the rights which the agreements confer on Ticketus in respect of (i) the Company’s Stadium, and (ii) the proceeds of future sales of season tickets for that Stadium;”


“a direction as to the legal test which is to be applied by [the] administrators or by the court in determining whether those administrators can be prevented from causing the company to terminate the agreements, albeit in breach of their terms.”

Having heard argument from counsel over several days, Lord Hodge declined to give a direction on the first matter as he considered that the court had not been given sufficient information to allow it to make such a ruling.

On the first alternative direction, having heard submissions as to whether Scots law or English law determined whether a trust had been created in the income from the season tickets, Lord Hodge held that Scots law was the governing law.  He directed that under Scots law Ticketus’ interests in seats at the Ibrox stadium, the tickets and the sale proceeds of those tickets were purely contractual rights and were not trust rights which would prevail over ordinary creditors in an insolvency.

On the second alternative direction Lord Hodge declined to state a test to be applied in all circumstances but discussed the circumstances in which the courts might order an administrator to perform a contract.  He summarised his views as follows:

“(i) an administrator must perform his functions in the interests of the company’s creditors as a whole (subject to the qualification in paragraph 3(4) of Schedule B 1 which is not relevant in this case); (ii) where the company in administration is insolvent, an administrator may have to decline to perform a contractual obligation of the company in pursuit of the statutory objective or objectives in his proposals if that is in the interests of the company’s creditors as a whole; (iii) should he do so, the court would not, absent exceptional circumstances, force the company to perform those contractual obligations to the detriment of the creditors as a whole; (iv) the court has power to interfere under paragraph 74 of Schedule B1 if the administrator’s decision is conspicuously unfair to a particular contractor or creditor; but (v) treating unsecured creditors in accordance with their legal rights in an insolvency would not of itself involve such unfairness.”

The full Opinion is available here.

Message from the Lord President


Welcome to the judicial website. We hope that you find this website both helpful and informative. It is our intention to publish as much information as we can, as quickly as we can. We believe it is vital in a democracy that justice is not only seen to be done, but that it operates in an open and transparent way and contributes to public understanding and awareness of what takes place in courts each day across Scotland.

Lord President

HMA v Jamie Anderson

Thursday, 21 March, 2019
Sentencing Statement

At the High Court in Glasgow today, 21 March 2019, Lord Arthurson sentenced Jamie Anderson to nine years’ imprisonment after the accused pled guilty to the culpable homicide of Paul Mathieson.

Read more

Thomas Sheridan v News Group Newspapers Limited

Tuesday, 11 December, 2018
Court Opinion

Thomas Sheridan is entitled to interest on the £200,000 damages he was awarded following his successful defamation action against the publishers of the News of the World, at the judicial rate of 8% per year from the date of the jury’s verdict in 2006 until the principal sum was paid in 2017.

Read more

Latest News


Keep up to date with the latest developments here or follow us on Twitter

Read the latest news